code-review

Automate a structured code review by applying a multi-dimension workflow to PR diffs, separating the Writer and Reviewer roles to enforce checks across correctness, boundaries, security, scope discipline, and maintainability.

Check a commit diff for security vulnerabilities and logic errors by running a multi-dimensional review that specifically evaluates security and correctness, counteracting cognitive bias through Writer and Reviewer separation.

Writer and Reviewer separation improves quality assurance by preventing cognitive bias during evaluation, allowing the reviewer to objectively assess maintainability and scope discipline without blind spots from writing the code.

You can generate a post-review report with actionable recommendations and learning notes after analyzing a diff, which records findings and updates rules to prevent repeat issues in future code reviews.

Automated diff analysis evaluates scope discipline and maintainability as two of its five core review dimensions, ensuring structured checks across the entire commit alongside correctness, boundaries, and security.

Use a multi-dimension code review workflow instead of manual checking to counteract systemic biases in AI-generated or self-authored code, enforcing structured quality assurance across five dimensions while building a learning loop.