code-review

Enforces automated code review across multiple AI engines for commits, PRs, and deployments.

1|Updated Feb 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aberrantCode/llm_skills --skill code-review-aberrantcode
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/aberrantCode/llm_skills/tree/main/claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aberrantCode/llm_skills --skill code-review-aberrantcode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enforces mandatory automated code reviews before commits, pull requests, and deployments to catch security vulnerabilities, performance regressions, and quality issues early in the developer workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi‑engine analysis: Run reviews with Claude, OpenAI Codex, Google Gemini, or combinations and compare/deduplicate findings.
  • Gate and integrate: Pre-commit hook, CI/CD workflows, and GitHub Actions examples that block commits or PRs for critical/high severity issues.
  • Practical use case: Use in local pre-commit checks to stop risky commits and in CI to post detailed review comments on pull requests.

Quick Start

Run /code-review on your staged changes to receive a prioritized review and automatically block commits with critical or high issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce automated code reviews on staged changes before a commit?

Automated code reviews on staged changes use a pre-commit hook that analyzes diffs and blocks commits containing critical or high severity issues. This stops risky code from entering your local repository.

Can I run multi-engine AI code analysis with Claude, Codex, and Gemini in my CI/CD pipeline?

Multi-engine AI code analysis with Claude, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini runs directly in your CI/CD pipeline. The workflow compares and deduplicates findings from these engines to post detailed review comments on pull requests.

What is the best way to gate pull requests using AI code review?

Gating pull requests using AI code review is best achieved by integrating it into your CI/CD workflows via GitHub Actions. This automatically blocks PRs that introduce critical or high severity security vulnerabilities and quality issues.

Does multi-engine AI code review help catch security vulnerabilities better than a single engine?

Multi-engine AI code review catches security vulnerabilities better by running analysis with Claude, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini simultaneously. Comparing and deduplicating findings provides broader coverage than relying on a single engine.

How does a pre-commit hook block commits for critical severity issues?

A pre-commit hook blocks commits for critical severity issues by performing automated code review checks on staged changes. If the analysis detects high or critical security vulnerabilities, the commit is stopped before it completes.

When do I need to block commits for critical or high severity issues in developer workflows?

You need to block commits for critical or high severity issues in developer workflows when repositories require strict PR gating and automated reviews. This prevents performance regressions and security vulnerabilities from reaching deployment diffs.