code-review-and-quality

Automate multi-axis code review across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

1|Updated Apr 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DavidEdeni/web-development-tools --skill code-review-and-quality-davidedeni
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-and-quality
Source: https://github.com/DavidEdeni/web-development-tools/tree/main/agent-skills/skills/code-review-and-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DavidEdeni/web-development-tools --skill code-review-and-quality-davidedeni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Consistent, high-quality code reviews before merging changes, across multiple dimensions to improve overall code health.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-axis evaluation for every change: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
  • Guidance on approvals that prioritize meaningful improvements while respecting project conventions.
  • Applicable to reviews of changes authored by humans or AI agents across feature work, bug fixes, and refactors.

Quick Start

Submit the code changes for review and let the system assess across all five axes before approval.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-and-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review before merging a pull request?

Automated code review evaluates pull requests across five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. It ensures changes meaningfully improve code health while respecting existing project conventions before approval.

Can I use automated code review for changes authored by AI agents?

Yes, automated code review applies to changes authored by both humans and AI agents. It evaluates feature work, bug fixes, and refactors across five axes to maintain code health before merging.

What is multi-axis code review and how does it evaluate architecture and security?

Multi-axis code review evaluates pull requests across five distinct axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. It guides approvals by prioritizing meaningful improvements while respecting project conventions.

Does automated code review work for both feature work and refactoring?

Automated code review works for feature work, bug fixes, and refactoring. It evaluates all types of changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance to ensure improvements to code health.

What's the best way to ensure code readability and security before a merge?

The best way to ensure readability and security before a merge is to apply a five-axis code review. This process evaluates changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance to approve meaningful improvements.

When do I need a multi-axis code review for my project conventions?

You need a multi-axis code review when you want consistent, high-quality evaluations before merging changes. It ensures that updates respect your project conventions while improving correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.