code-review-and-quality

Review code changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

2|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/heimanba/port-lens --skill code-review-and-quality-heimanba
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-and-quality
Source: https://github.com/heimanba/port-lens/tree/main/.cursor/skills/code-review-and-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/heimanba/port-lens --skill code-review-and-quality-heimanba

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews often miss critical quality gates and consistency across multiple axes. This Skill provides a structured, multi-axis evaluation to ensure changes improve overall code health before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-Axis Review: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
  • Guardrails and feedback: actionable guidance to improve code health.
  • PR/Change readiness: ensures changes meet project conventions and quality standards.

Quick Start

Execute a five-axis review on a new change and provide structured, actionable feedback to guide the next iteration.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-and-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a five-axis code review and how does it improve merge quality?

A five-axis code review evaluates changes for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging. This structured approach enforces quality gates and provides actionable feedback to ensure changes improve overall code health.

How do I perform a structured code review on a pull request before merge?

Perform a structured code review by applying five-axis evaluation criteria to the pull request, checking correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance to generate clear, actionable feedback for safe deployment.

Can this code review process be used for both refactoring and bug fixes?

Yes, this code review process applies to feature additions, refactors, and bug fixes. It evaluates all changes against consistent five-axis criteria to ensure changes meet project conventions and quality standards.

What's the best way to enforce code quality standards across multiple dimensions?

The best way to enforce code quality standards is using a multi-axis evaluation mechanism that checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, delivering structured feedback to guide the next iteration.

Why does my code review process miss critical security and architecture issues?

Your code review process misses issues because it lacks a structured five-axis evaluation covering correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Applying explicit validation steps ensures comprehensive quality checks before deployment.