code-review-and-quality

Enforce structured multi-dimensional code review before merging changes.

Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/j-cogburn/d3 --skill code-review-and-quality-j-cogburn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-and-quality
Source: https://github.com/j-cogburn/d3/tree/main/tests/project-t01/.d3/skills/code-review-and-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/j-cogburn/d3 --skill code-review-and-quality-j-cogburn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Merging unvetted code introduces bugs, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt that slows development and increases maintenance costs. This Skill eliminates that risk by enforcing mandatory, structured code review for every change before it enters the main branch.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 5-Axis Quality Review: Evaluates every change across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance to catch issues across all critical dimensions.
  • Structured Review Workflow: Provides a step-by-step process with severity-labeled feedback (Critical, Nit, Optional) to eliminate ambiguous comments and speed up review cycles.
  • Change Governance: Enforces optimal change sizing, separates refactoring from feature work, and includes dead code hygiene checks to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when reviewing PRs from team members, code generated by AI agents, or your own changes before merging to ensure no critical issues slip through.

Quick Start

Use the code-review-and-quality skill to review the attached pull request #456 for correctness, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to project coding conventions before approving the merge.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-and-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce a structured code review for pull requests before merging?

Enforce structured code review by applying a multi-axis quality check to every pull request before merge. This process evaluates correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance while providing severity-labeled feedback to prevent buggy or insecure code from entering the main branch.

What is a multi-axis code quality review and how does it work?

A multi-axis code quality review evaluates changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. It works by applying a structured workflow with severity-labeled feedback to catch issues across all critical dimensions before code enters the main branch.

Can I use an automated PR review to check AI-generated code for security vulnerabilities?

Yes, you can use an automated PR review to check AI-generated code for security vulnerabilities. This process applies mandatory multi-dimensional code review to all changes, including AI-generated code, ensuring security and correctness are validated before merge.

What is the best way to manage technical debt and dead code during refactoring?

Manage technical debt and dead code during refactoring by enforcing change governance rules. This approach separates refactoring from feature work, enforces optimal change sizing, and includes dead code hygiene checks to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

How do I categorize PR review comments to speed up the review cycle?

Categorize PR review comments using severity-labeled feedback tiers like Critical, Nit, and Optional. This structured review workflow eliminates ambiguous comments, clarifies issue priority, and significantly speeds up the review cycle for developers.