code-review-and-quality

Automate PR review by running this skill to ensure correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance meet defined criteria. It categorizes comments with severity labels and provides change sizing guidelines to maintain PR manageability before merging.

Structure code review using a five-axis evaluation covering correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. This process emphasizes testing, implementation, and verification, utilizing severity labels like critical, required, and optional to clarify feedback.

Change sizing provides guidelines for diff size and scope to maintain PR manageability during code review. It helps evaluate the scale of changes, ensuring the review process remains structured and focused on defined project criteria.

Yes, multi-agent review supports evaluation by multiple agents with specialized focus areas. This approach ensures comprehensive code quality, security, and adherence to project standards across different aspects of the PR review process.

Yes, project-specific configurations and tooling are required for the review processes. These configurations allow the automated code review to accurately assess code quality, security, and adherence to your defined project standards.

Code review comments are categorized using severity labels: critical, required, optional, nit, or FYI. This labeling system provides clarity during the review process, helping developers understand the importance and urgency of each piece of feedback.