code-review-and-quality

Evaluate code quality across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill code-review-and-quality-soloamente
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-and-quality
Source: https://github.com/soloamente/still/tree/main/.cursor/skills/code-review-and-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill code-review-and-quality-soloamente

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill conducts a comprehensive multi-axis review of code to assess quality across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging changes into the main branch.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-axis Code Review: Evaluates code for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
  • Use Case: Ideal for before merging changes, during feature implementations, when code is written by an AI agent, after bug fixes, and during refactoring.

Quick Start

Conduct a code review with the Skill by using the command: code-review-and-quality -i my-code-file.ts

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-and-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a multi-axis code review before merging changes?

Use the Skill via command line by passing your file as input, such as `code-review-and-quality -i my-code-file.ts`. This triggers a multi-axis evaluation of correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance for your pre-merge or post-implementation analysis.

Can I audit code security and performance automatically after an AI agent writes it?

Yes, you can audit AI-generated code by running a security analysis and performance auditing process. This evaluates the implementation for vulnerabilities and inefficiencies, providing feedback suitable for refining AI-generated code and bug fixes.

What is the best way to assess code architecture and readability during refactoring?

Assess code architecture and readability during refactoring by running a multi-axis review. It evaluates structural design and clarity, ensuring programming practices meet quality standards before finalizing changes.

Does this code review process work without external dependencies or environment setup?

Yes, this code review process works without external dependencies. It operates standalone to evaluate code quality, allowing you to assess correctness and security without configuring additional environment setup tools.

When should I use an automated code quality evaluation instead of manual review?

Automated code quality evaluation should be used for pre-merge reviews, AI agent outputs, and refactoring to quickly identify architectural, security, and performance issues. Manual review remains better for nuanced business logic decisions.