What problem does it solve? Code reviews are often inconsistent because reviewers apply personal preferences instead of shared standards. This Skill applies a fixed set of team engineering conventions to every review, producing structured findings grouped by severity with a single clear recommendation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Convention-Based Review: Evaluates changes against explicit rules for naming, error handling, TypeScript usage, function design, security, and testing. - Severity-Grouped Findings: Reports issues as Critical, Warning, or Suggestion, each with a file:line reference and a concrete fix. - Single Verdict Output: Ends every review with exactly one recommendation: APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or NEEDS DISCUSSION. - Use Case: Before merging a pull request, ask for a review of the diff to catch missing error handling, any types, unparameterized SQL, or weak test assertions against your team's standards. ## Quick Start Review my staged changes against the team engineering conventions and give me a severity-grouped report with a final recommendation.
