code-review-assist

Provide a PR number or ask for a review session, and the skill fetches the diff, summarizes the change, maps affected owners and responsibilities, and lists severity-labeled concerns. You stay in control of all final review decisions and posted comments.

The session planning step discovers open PRs requesting your review, recently merged PRs, and PRs with new pushes, then assigns each a high/medium/low risk estimate. You choose the review order: chronological, highest-risk-first, or by author.

This skill supports human-in-the-loop review sessions where you make the decisions, while autonomous reviewer agents check best practices independently. It prepares summaries, concerns, and draft comments but never posts anything without your approval.

Yes, every drafted comment is prefixed with a conventional comments label: blocker, suggestion, nitpick, or question. Severity is calibrated aggressively, and all drafts are shown to you before posting.

Yes, during session planning it identifies PRs whose base branch is another PR in the list, groups them as a stack, and notes the dependency chain and each PR's responsibility within it.

Do not treat its output as a final verdict; it explicitly avoids blanket approvals and states assumptions when context is missing. Security-critical or unfamiliar subsystems still require your direct inspection of the diff.