Code Review Assistant

Automates code review for MobX patterns, UI components, architecture, and testing.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/biggs3d/Tools --skill code-review-assistant
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Code Review Assistant
Source: https://github.com/biggs3d/Tools/tree/main/.ai-guidance/.claude/skills/review-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/biggs3d/Tools --skill code-review-assistant

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Eliminate guesswork in code reviews by enforcing Phoenix/FAAD HMI standards, improving consistency and reducing review time across MobX patterns, UI components, architecture, testing, and common pitfalls.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided review process aligned with REVIEW.md and deep-dive documentation.
  • Checks MobX patterns, UI components, architecture, and testing quality.
  • Produces structured, actionable feedback with references to specific files and lines.

Quick Start

Provide the MR description and file list to run a full code review. Example: "Review MR #123 for MobX usage against Phoenix guidelines."

Frequently Asked Questions about Code Review Assistant

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for Phoenix and MobX patterns?

Automate code reviews by providing MR descriptions and file lists to identify quality, architecture, and standard-compliance issues in MobX patterns, UI components, and Entity ViewModels against Phoenix/FAAD guidelines, producing structured feedback with severity levels.

Can I use automated code review to enforce architecture standards in pull requests?

Yes. Automated code review enforces Phoenix/FAAD HMI standards across MobX patterns, UI components, architecture, and testing by cross-referencing REVIEW.md documentation and outputting actionable feedback with specific file and line references.

What code review checks does this handle for React components and MobX?

Code review checks MobX patterns, UI components, Property ViewModels, Entity ViewModels, architecture consistency, and testing quality, applying category-driven checklists aligned with Phoenix/FAAD best practices to identify and suggest fixes for common pitfalls.

How do I run code reviews on local changes and pre-commit checks?

Provide file changes or pre-commit snapshots to run full code reviews that identify quality and compliance issues in MobX patterns, components, and architecture, delivering structured feedback suitable for local validation and pre-commit integration.

What's the difference between manual and automated code review for architecture standards?

Automated code review enforces consistent Phoenix/FAAD standards without guesswork, checking MobX patterns, components, and architecture systematically with structured severity levels and suggested fixes, reducing review time and improving consistency across pull requests.

Do I need specific documentation to use code review automation for Phoenix projects?

Code review automation references REVIEW.md and related Phoenix/FAAD documentation to validate MobX patterns, components, and architecture; provide MR descriptions and file lists, and the tool cross-references existing guides to produce compliant feedback.