code-review

Identify security and quality risks in code changes during reviews.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/attentiondotnet/hermes-agent --skill code-review-attentiondotnet
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/attentiondotnet/hermes-agent/tree/main/skills/software-development/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/attentiondotnet/hermes-agent --skill code-review-attentiondotnet

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews can miss critical security and quality issues without a standardized approach. This skill provides a comprehensive, checklist-driven framework to ensure thorough, consistent reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security-first review prompts and checks
  • Error handling and testing considerations
  • Clear feedback templates to guide developers

Quick Start

Review a new pull request by applying the security, error handling, and code quality checklist, then provide actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What should a code review checklist include to catch security and quality risks?

A code review checklist for security and quality should include security-first prompts, error handling checks, and testing considerations to identify and mitigate risks in code changes. This ensures consistent enforcement of secure coding standards across languages.

How do I review a pull request for security vulnerabilities and coding standard violations?

Review a pull request by applying a structured checklist that evaluates security risks, error handling, and code quality. This process generates clear, actionable feedback to guide developers in maintaining secure and maintainable designs.

Does structured code review work for feature branches and audits across different programming languages?

Structured code review works for feature branches and audits across multiple languages by applying a standardized, checklist-driven framework. This approach enforces secure coding standards consistently regardless of the programming language used.

What is the best way to provide code review feedback that actually improves code quality?

The best way to provide code review feedback is using a clear feedback template that delivers actionable recommendations. This structured format guides developers effectively and helps enforce maintainable designs during the review process.

Why do code reviews miss critical security issues without a standardized approach?

Code reviews miss critical security issues without a standardized approach because inconsistent checks overlook vulnerabilities. Implementing a comprehensive, checklist-driven framework ensures thorough and consistent identification of security and quality risks.