code-review

Guide code reviews through structured checklists and evidence-based feedback.

2|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets --skill code-review-avav25
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets/tree/main/.windsurf/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets --skill code-review-avav25

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It guides reviewers through a structured framework to identify defects, regressions, and quality gaps during code reviews, reducing ambiguity and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Checklist-driven review workflow ensuring consistency across PRs.
  • Guidance for security, performance, tests, and documentation coverage.
  • Applicable to feature PRs, architecture reviews, and audits.

Quick Start

Initiate a review by loading the structured checklist into the PR and following the prompts.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review for a pull request?

Perform a structured code review by loading a predefined checklist into the PR and following prompts to assess architecture alignment, test coverage, security, and performance. This workflow identifies defects and quality gaps while providing evidence-based feedback to reduce ambiguity and rework.

What is a checklist-driven code review workflow?

A checklist-driven code review workflow ensures consistency across PRs by guiding reviewers through structured prompts. It enforces comprehensive requirements for architecture alignment, test coverage, risk mitigation, and documentation, resulting in clear outcomes and evidence-based feedback templates.

Can I use this structured review process for security and performance audits?

Yes, this structured review process applies across feature PRs, architecture revisions, and security or performance audits. It guides reviewers through targeted checklists to identify vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and quality gaps with evidence-based feedback.

What is the best way to ensure test coverage and architecture alignment during code reviews?

The best way to ensure test coverage and architecture alignment is to apply a structured review framework with defined checklists. This enforces comprehensive review requirements, guiding reviewers to provide evidence-based feedback and clear outcomes for code changes.

How do I reduce ambiguity and rework when identifying code defects?

Reduce ambiguity and rework during code reviews by following a structured framework with defined feedback templates. This guides reviewers through evidence-based checklists to identify defects, regressions, and quality gaps, ensuring clear outcomes for developers.