code-review

Automate structured code reviews with security, correctness, style, performance, and testing checks.

2|Updated Apr 8, 2026

Search Tags:#testing #performance #security #style #code-review #correctness

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/aviraldua93/wiki-recall --skill code-review-aviraldua93

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/aviraldua93/wiki-recall/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aviraldua93/wiki-recall --skill code-review-aviraldua93

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, repeatable framework for code reviews, ensuring security, correctness, style, performance, and testing considerations are consistently applied across changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

Layered review protocol: security, correctness, style, performance, and testing checks that guide reviewers through a comprehensive evaluation.
Versatile usage: applicable to pull requests, self-reviews, audits, onboarding, and post-incident retrospectives to improve code quality.
Audit-ready output: produces a clear, structured review report that captures findings, severity, and recommended fixes.

Quick Start

Follow the five-layer protocol to review a code change and generate a structured report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is a structured multi-layer code review and how does it work?▼

A structured multi-layer code review evaluates changes across security, correctness, style, performance, and testing. It works by applying a five-layer protocol to guide reviewers through a comprehensive evaluation, resulting in a structured report of findings and recommended fixes.

How do I automate code reviews for pull requests to enforce standards?▼

You can automate code reviews for pull requests by applying a layered protocol that checks security, correctness, style, performance, and testing. This generates an audit-ready report capturing findings and severity to enforce quality standards consistently.

Can I use this code review framework for self-reviews and post-incident audits?▼

Yes, you can use this code review framework for self-reviews, post-incident audits, and onboarding. It applies a versatile five-layer protocol to evaluate code changes, delivering a structured report that improves quality across various software project contexts.

What is the best way to review code for security and performance defects?▼

The best way to review code for security and performance defects is using a structured five-layer protocol. This approach systematically checks security, correctness, style, performance, and testing to catch defects and produce a report with recommended fixes.

Does this code review protocol support testing and correctness checks?▼

Yes, this code review protocol explicitly supports testing and correctness checks. It implements a comprehensive five-layer evaluation protocol that includes dedicated checks for testing and correctness alongside security, style, and performance to ensure code quality.

When should I not use an automated multi-layer code review approach?▼

You should not use an automated multi-layer code review when you need a quick syntax check or lack the context for a full audit. This approach is designed for comprehensive evaluations requiring structured reports across five distinct quality layers.