code-review

Automate structured code review quality assurance for pull requests.

1|Updated Feb 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/az9713/my-agent-skills --skill code-review-az9713
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/az9713/my-agent-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/az9713/my-agent-skills --skill code-review-az9713

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, repeatable framework for code reviews to catch defects, enforce standards, and improve maintainability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive checklist across code quality, safety, performance, testing, and documentation to standardize reviews.
  • Guided review process with a clear, multi-step workflow including high-severity issues and actionable feedback templates.
  • Templates & artifacts such as a review report and severity-based findings to communicate results to stakeholders.

Quick Start

Start by applying the checklist to a pull request to generate a consistent, actionable review.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests to enforce quality standards?

Automated code review applies a multi-domain checklist to pull requests to enforce standards, identify defects, and improve reliability. It generates a templated review report with severity levels and actionable feedback guidelines.

What should be included in a structured code review checklist?

A structured code review checklist should cover code quality, logic, error handling, security, performance, testing, and documentation. This multi-domain coverage standardizes reviews and improves software maintainability across projects.

How do I generate a code review report with severity levels for stakeholders?

Generate a code review report using a templated format that categorizes findings by severity levels. This provides clear, actionable feedback to stakeholders and ensures consistent communication of defects and quality issues.

Does this code review process require frontmatter metadata to function?

Yes, the code review process satisfies requirements for a frontmatter-driven metadata model. This ensures the review framework remains structured, repeatable, and consistently applied across different software development projects.

Can I apply quality assurance templates to code changes across multiple projects?

Yes, you can apply quality assurance templates to code changes across multiple projects. The guided review process uses a multi-step workflow to standardize evaluations and communicate high-severity issues effectively.