code-review

Analyze code against OWASP guidelines and SOLID principles for security and quality.

Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/B4san/Calix-Pass --skill code-review-b4san
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/B4san/Calix-Pass/tree/main/.gemini/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/B4san/Calix-Pass --skill code-review-b4san

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the need for thorough code quality, security, and architectural reviews, ensuring code is maintainable, performant, and adheres to best practices.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Analysis: Reviews code for security vulnerabilities (OWASP), architectural soundness (SOLID principles), code quality, performance bottlenecks, and testing coverage.
  • Actionable Feedback: Provides detailed, constructive feedback with specific examples and suggested fixes.
  • Use Case: Before merging a new feature, use this Skill to perform a pre-merge code review, identifying potential security risks and suggesting refactorings for better maintainability.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to analyze the provided code snippet for security and style issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a pre-merge code review for security vulnerabilities and architectural issues?

Pre-merge code review analyzes your code against OWASP guidelines and SOLID principles to identify security vulnerabilities and architectural flaws. It provides actionable feedback with specific examples and suggested refactorings to ensure maintainable, performant software before merging.

What is the best way to check my code for OWASP security risks and SOLID principle violations?

Checking code for OWASP security risks and SOLID principle violations involves a comprehensive analysis of your codebase for vulnerabilities and structural soundness. This process identifies potential security flaws and suggests targeted refactorings to enforce best practices for maintainable software.

How do I find performance bottlenecks and improve code quality during refactoring?

Finding performance bottlenecks and improving code quality during refactoring requires analyzing your code for inefficiencies and testing coverage gaps. The review pinpoints specific performance issues and offers constructive feedback with suggested fixes to enhance overall execution and maintainability.

Can I use automated code review to ensure adherence to project standards and best practices?

Automated code review ensures adherence to project standards and best practices by evaluating your code's architecture, quality, and performance. It detects deviations from established guidelines and generates detailed, actionable feedback to align your implementation with required standards.

Does code review work for analyzing testing coverage and suggesting maintainable code refactorings?

Code review works for analyzing testing coverage by evaluating how well your tests validate the implementation against best practices. It identifies gaps in coverage and suggests specific refactorings to improve the maintainability and quality of your software architecture.