code-review-basic

Validates git diff changes against CLAUDE.md project guidelines and reports issues with severity scores.

21|8|Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/speednet-software/speedwave --skill code-review-basic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-basic
Source: https://github.com/speednet-software/speedwave/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review-basic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/speednet-software/speedwave --skill code-review-basic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review code against project guidelines (CLAUDE.md) to ensure consistency, quality, and compliance, reducing manual review effort and false positives.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated review scope: Validate unstaged changes from git diff against project guidelines and conventions.
  • Bugs & quality detection: Identify logic errors, missing error handling, security issues, and style deviations.
  • Structured reporting: Generate actionable issue lists with severity scores, file paths, line numbers, and concrete fixes.

Quick Start

Review the current diff against CLAUDE.md and report high-confidence issues only.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-basic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review against project guidelines?

Automated code review validates unstaged git diff changes against project guidelines defined in CLAUDE.md. It checks multi-language repositories for conventions, error handling, and security, outputting structured reports with severity scores and concrete fixes.

What is issue scoring in automated code quality checks?

Issue scoring assigns a 0-100 severity value to detected code quality issues during review. This scoring system helps prioritize bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style deviations by generating actionable lists with file paths, line numbers, and CLAUDE.md rule references.

How do I review a pull request for security and testing practices?

Reviewing a pull request for security and testing involves validating code changes against project conventions. The process identifies missing error handling, logic errors, and security issues, then generates a structured report with line numbers and specific fixes.

Does automated code review work with multi-language repositories?

Automated code review supports multi-language repositories by validating changes against project guidelines. It applies to diverse review scenarios including imports, naming conventions, error handling, and testing practices without relying on language-specific component dependencies.

What's the best way to reduce false positives in code review?

To reduce false positives in code review, validate unstaged changes strictly against established project guidelines in CLAUDE.md and report only high-confidence issues. This ensures consistency and compliance while minimizing manual review effort.