code-review-battery

Dispatch five parallel reviewer agents to analyze git diffs and enforce quality thresholds.

8|1|Updated Jan 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bordenet/superpowers-plus --skill code-review-battery
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-battery
Source: https://github.com/bordenet/superpowers-plus/tree/main/skills/engineering/code-review-battery
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bordenet/superpowers-plus --skill code-review-battery

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manual code reviews often miss defects, are shallow, and generate high false‑positive rates, slowing development and risking quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel specialist reviewers: Dispatches five focused agents (defect, design, security, standards, performance) to analyze a diff simultaneously.
  • Smart triage: Activates only relevant reviewers based on the changed files, reducing token cost.
  • Aggregated report with escalation: Consolidates findings, applies convergence logic, and can re‑dispatch for deeper analysis before a commit is accepted.
  • Use cases: Validate pull‑request diffs, staged commits, or any git diff where a rigorous quality gate is required.

Quick Start

Use the code‑review‑battery skill to evaluate the current git diff and receive a detailed, prioritized review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-battery

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a code review on a git diff before committing?

You can automate code review by dispatching five parallel specialist reviewer agents that analyze a git diff, aggregate findings, and enforce a quality threshold before allowing commits.

Can I run parallel code reviewers on staged commits and pull request diffs?

Parallel code reviewers can be applied to pull-request diffs, staged commits, or any git diff where thorough quality inspection and a rigorous quality gate are required.

What is the best way to reduce false positives in automated code reviews?

To reduce false positives, use smart triage that activates only relevant reviewers based on changed files, and apply convergence logic to consolidate findings before accepting a commit.

Does this automated code review tool check security and performance issues?

Automated code review dispatches five focused agents covering defect detection, design, security, standards, and performance to analyze your diff simultaneously for comprehensive quality inspection.

How does the quality gate work when reviewing code changes?

The quality gate works by aggregating findings from all parallel reviewers, applying convergence logic, and optionally re-dispatching for deeper analysis before a commit is accepted.