Separate generator and evaluator roles to review code against security and quality standards.
npx skills add https://github.com/bostonaholic/team --skill code-review-bostonaholic
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/bostonaholic/team/tree/main/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bostonaholic/team --skill code-review-bostonaholic
This skill eliminates self-evaluation bias and quality degradation by enforcing a strict generator-evaluator separation, ensuring that code is reviewed by agents with fresh context and no prior involvement in the implementation.
Invoke the code-review skill to perform a comprehensive quality and security audit on the current diff against the established project standards.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Enforce bias-free code review by separating generator and evaluator roles to prevent self-evaluation. This skill objectively audits diffs against security, maintainability, and test-quality standards to gate pipeline progression.
Yes, code review automation can block pipeline progression using severity-based gating. It evaluates changes against security, technical standards, and test quality to halt merges for critical defects.
Generator-evaluator separation improves code review by ensuring agents with fresh context evaluate changes without prior implementation involvement. This prevents self-evaluation bias and quality degradation.
Standardize automated code review feedback using conventional comment formatting. The skill categorizes feedback with issue, suggestion, and nitpick labels to clarify severity and required actions.
Yes, automated code review validates implementation correctness, SOLID principles, and documentation completeness. It comprehensively evaluates code changes to ensure they meet established engineering standards.
Use conventional comments in automated code review when standardizing feedback clarity across pipelines. This formatting labels issues, suggestions, and nitpicks to automate severity-based gating for technical standards.
mamu7211Review GitHub pull request diffs for correctness, security, and conventions.
dayvidphamStandardize review findings with severity classification via Beads CLI.
mlbrightAnalyzes Rails code quality and security via automated tools.
peancharoenRun static analysis tools to detect linting, type, and security issues across source code.
