code-review

A structured code review evaluates pull requests by running automated gates like lint, typecheck, tests, and build, followed by a manual assessment of correctness, architecture, and security to produce an actionable report.

Before merging a pull request, you should check correctness, architecture compliance, security, performance, financial logic, testing, and style to ensure codebase maintainability and mitigate vulnerabilities.

Yes, you can audit ad-hoc code changes by gathering the diff and applying the multi-dimensional review framework to evaluate code quality, correctness, and security outside of a formal pull request workflow.

Yes, the code review process runs an engine-guided workflow that executes automated lint, typecheck, test, and build gates to validate code quality before generating the structured multi-dimensional report.

The best way to ensure security and architecture compliance in critical code paths is to perform a comprehensive review using an 8-dimensions checklist that evaluates security, performance, and financial logic.

Using a multi-dimensional template for PR audits enforces a repeatable workflow that systematically evaluates correctness, architecture, and security, producing a single actionable report to speed up merges.