code-review

To enforce code quality in Kotlin Android projects, you can systematically identify architectural, design, and style violations by applying per-file-type rules across UI/Compose, ViewModel, and Data layers to generate structured feedback reports.

A static analysis code review detects MVI architecture and dependency injection violations by evaluating changed files against a team-wide checklist, ensuring proper DI usage and adherence to Kotlin coding standards before producing a categorized feedback report.

Yes, you can generate Pull Request review feedback for Jetpack Compose UI layers by analyzing changed files to detect hard-coded strings and design violations, outputting categorized BLOCKER, ROAST, and PRAISE guidance for improvements.

The best way to automate checklist enforcement for Kotlin coding standards is to run targeted reviews on changed files after a feature is implemented, checking for specific violations and generating a report to guide improvements.

Yes, this code review process works for both feature implementations and bug fixes by scanning the changed files after implementation to identify architectural, design, and style violations across the specified project layers.

You need a targeted code review for your Android codebase after a feature or fix is implemented to systematically identify architectural, design, and style violations, ensuring code quality and consistency across the project.