code-review-checklist

Automate structured code-review governance with severity-level findings and standardized reporting.

284|47|Updated Dec 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/groupzer0/vs-code-agents --skill code-review-checklist-groupzer0
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-checklist
Source: https://github.com/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/tree/main/vs-code-agents/skills/code-review-checklist
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/groupzer0/vs-code-agents --skill code-review-checklist-groupzer0

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires npx, eslint, prettier, tsc, ruff, flake8, mypy, go, staticcheck, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, auditable framework for evaluating software plans, code quality, and security across pre- and post-implementation reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pre-Implementation Review: guides Critic through plan quality, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and risks.
  • Post-Implementation Review: supports Security/Architect checks for code quality, architecture conformance, and maintainability.
  • Finding Format & Severity: standardizes results using the Finding Format and severity levels.

Quick Start

Run the pre-implementation review on a planned change and generate a findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-checklist

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a structured code review for security and architecture compliance?

Pre-implementation code review evaluates plan quality, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and risks before development starts. This structured governance ensures architecture alignment and identifies potential security or maintainability issues early in the software lifecycle.

Can I use eslint and prettier for post-implementation code quality checks?

A code review checklist enforces standardized findings with severity levels and provides agent-specific guidance for both pre-implementation planning and post-implementation validation. This ensures consistent, auditable governance across architecture, maintainability, risks, and compliance.

What's the best way to standardize code review findings across different programming languages?

Standardize code review findings by applying a consistent reporting format with severity levels across projects. This governance approach supports multiple language linters like eslint, ruff, flake8, mypy, and staticcheck to unify architecture, security, and quality validation.

Do I need npx installed to run automated code review checklists?

Limitations of automated code review include dependency on specific linters like eslint, ruff, mypy, and staticcheck for quality validation. Projects outside these supported ecosystems or lacking npx cannot fully utilize the standardized architecture and security posture assessment.