code-review-commons

Name: code-review-commons
Availability: InStock
Author: avatar-arts

Identify bugs, vulnerabilities, and performance issues in code diffs.

Updated May 11, 2026

Search Tags:#performance #security #code-quality #code-review #pull-request #diff-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers --skill code-review-commons

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-commons
Source: https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers/tree/main/extensions/code-review/skills/code-review-commons
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers --skill code-review-commons

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Common guidelines for performing high-quality code reviews, including persona, objectives, and structured feedback strategies.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured review guidance covering intent, context, and change impact.
Line-focused feedback with concrete, actionable suggestions.
Works across languages and diff formats to improve code quality in PRs and reviews.

Quick Start

Review the attached diff using the guided checklist and return concrete code-change recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-commons

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a code review on a pull request to catch security vulnerabilities and bugs?▼

To perform a code review on a pull request, apply strict review logic to diffs to identify potential bugs and security vulnerabilities. The process prioritizes application logic and edge-case scenarios, delivering line-focused comments with actionable feedback and concrete code suggestions.

What is the best way to analyze code diffs for performance bottlenecks and readability issues?▼

Analyzing code diffs for performance bottlenecks and readability issues involves applying guided review logic across languages. It delivers line-focused feedback with concrete code-change recommendations and maintainable guidance aligned to defensive coding and performance best practices.

Can I use automated code review guidance across different programming languages?▼

Yes, you can use structured code review guidance across different programming languages. It works across languages and diff formats to evaluate code changes, prioritizing application logic and edge-case scenarios to improve overall code quality in pull requests.

Does code review guidance provide concrete code suggestions for fixing identified issues?▼

Yes, code review guidance provides concrete code suggestions for fixing identified issues. It implements strict review logic with line-focused comments, rationale, and maintainable guidance, ensuring feedback is actionable and aligned with defensive coding best practices.

How do I ensure my pull request feedback remains maintainable and follows defensive coding?▼

To ensure pull request feedback remains maintainable and follows defensive coding, use structured review guidance that delivers line-focused comments with rationale. This approach aligns feedback with defensive coding and performance best practices for long-term code quality.

What should I check for when reviewing code changes for edge-case scenarios?▼

When reviewing code changes for edge-case scenarios, check for potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and performance bottlenecks. Applying guided review logic to diffs helps identify these issues while delivering actionable feedback with concrete code suggestions.