code-review

Generates systematic, checklist-based code reviews for pull requests with CI-ready automation patterns.

364|53|Updated May 9, 2026

Search Tags:#code review #pull requests #software quality #developer productivity #team collaboration #security checks #CI automation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills --skill code-review-cosmicstack-labs

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills/tree/main/categories/development/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills --skill code-review-cosmicstack-labs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams perform systematic, constructive code reviews that catch bugs early, improve code quality, and strengthen collaboration without slowing delivery.

Core Features & Use Cases

PR Checklist: A practical, stack-agnostic review checklist covering design, correctness, security, performance, testing, and maintainability.
Feedback Techniques: Structured feedback patterns (SBI, comment classification, and conversation-style review) to make reviews more effective and respectful.
Review Automation Patterns: Ready-to-adapt CI/Danger rules and bot rule templates to automate repetitive review checks and enforce standards consistently.
Use Case: Use it when preparing a PR to ensure the review covers edge cases, security risks, performance regressions, and adequate test coverage, while also standardizing feedback across the team.

Quick Start

Ask your AI to draft a code review for your pull request using the provided PR checklist, including blocking, suggested improvements, and review automation ideas.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a systematic pull request review for correctness and security?▼

Perform a systematic pull request review by applying a stack-agnostic checklist that covers design, correctness, security, performance, testing, and maintainability to catch bugs early and improve software quality.

What is the best way to give constructive code review feedback that improves team collaboration?▼

Constructive code review feedback uses structured patterns like SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) and comment classification to make reviews more effective, humane, and respectful, which strengthens team collaboration during day-to-day PR workflows.

Can I automate repetitive code review checks using CI and Danger rules?▼

Yes, you can automate repetitive code review checks using ready-to-adapt CI/Danger rules and bot rule templates to enforce team standards consistently, reducing manual effort and improving review speed for both small and riskier changes.

How do I create team standards for code reviews that cover edge cases and performance regressions?▼

Create team standards for code reviews by establishing a practical, stack-agnostic checklist ensuring coverage of edge cases, security risks, performance regressions, and adequate test coverage, while standardizing feedback techniques across the team.

Does the code review checklist work for both small changes and riskier pull requests?▼

Yes, the code review checklist is designed for day-to-day PR review workflows, effectively standardizing feedback and improving review speed for both small changes and riskier pull requests within your team's development cycle.