code-review

Automate layered code reviews for correctness, security, and maintainability.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy --skill code-review-cris-m
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy/tree/main/src/team/templates/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cris-m/flopsy --skill code-review-cris-m

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are essential but time-consuming and inconsistent. This Skill provides a structured, repeatable method to assess code across architecture, correctness, security, performance, and maintainability, helping teams ship higher-quality software faster.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Layered review framework spanning Architecture and Design, Correctness, Security, Performance, and Style.
  • Generates actionable feedback tailored for PR discussions and future maintenance.
  • Use Case: review a new feature PR or audit a legacy code change for potential issues before merge.

Quick Start

Review the latest changes in the pull request and provide a structured critique using the five layers.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for a pull request?

Automating code reviews for a pull request requires a structured framework to assess architecture, correctness, security, performance, and style. This approach generates actionable feedback tailored for PR discussions before merge.

What is the best way to check code quality and maintainability in legacy code?

Checking code quality and maintainability in legacy code involves running a layered review process. This identifies potential issues across correctness and security, providing structured feedback for future maintenance.

Can I use static analysis to find security issues in new features before merge?

Yes, static analysis can find security issues in new features before merge by applying a layered review framework. This process evaluates security alongside architecture and performance to ensure comprehensive automated QA.

Does a structured review process improve consistency over manual code checks?

A structured review process improves consistency over manual code checks by applying repeatable criteria across architecture, correctness, security, performance, and style. This reduces time-consuming inconsistencies in software engineering.

What should be included in an automated code review checklist?

An automated code review checklist should include layered checks for architecture and design, correctness, security, performance, and style. This generates structured critique and actionable feedback for pull requests.