code-review

Identify security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and quality issues in code changes.

20|3|Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DVNghiem/FlowDeck --skill code-review-dvnghiem
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/DVNghiem/FlowDeck/tree/main/src/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DVNghiem/FlowDeck --skill code-review-dvnghiem

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review is essential to catch security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and quality issues before they reach production, reducing risk and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Targeted analysis of changed code during a pull request or commit, speeding up feedback.
  • Severity-ranked outputs with clear remediation steps to guide fixes.
  • Integrated workflow support for PR checks, CI gates, and pre-push validations.

Quick Start

Review the latest commit for security and quality issues and return a prioritized remediation plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect security vulnerabilities in my code changes before pushing?

Detect security vulnerabilities in code changes by analyzing touched files during pull requests or commits. This process identifies confirmed risks, ranks them by severity, and provides actionable remediation steps to prevent issues from reaching production.

What is static analysis for bug detection during pull request reviews?

Static analysis for bug detection during pull request reviews evaluates modified source code to identify logic errors and quality issues. It targets only the touched files to speed up feedback and outputs a severity-ranked list of confirmed problems with guidance for fixes.

Can I use automated code review for pre-push checks and CI gates?

Automated code review supports pre-push checks and CI gates by assessing changed files for security vulnerabilities and quality issues. It ensures only confirmed issues are flagged and delivers prioritized remediation plans to block problematic code from integration.

How do I get a prioritized remediation plan for logic errors in my latest commit?

Get a prioritized remediation plan for logic errors by running a code review on your latest commit. The analysis assesses the touched files, confirms the existence of logic errors and quality issues, and outputs ranked, actionable steps to guide your fixes.

Does automated code review flag false positives during quality assurance checks?

Automated code review minimizes false positives during quality assurance checks by ensuring only confirmed security vulnerabilities and logic errors are flagged. It focuses strictly on identified issues in touched files and provides clear remediation guidance rather than speculative warnings.

What is the best way to catch quality issues in a typical software project?

The best way to catch quality issues in a typical software project is targeted code review during changes. By analyzing touched files in pull requests and pre-push validations, you receive severity-ranked outputs with actionable steps to fix confirmed problems early.