code-review

Analyze pull request code changes and return PASS or FAIL with feedback.

1|Updated Feb 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dwoolworth/devteam --skill code-review-dwoolworth
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/dwoolworth/devteam/tree/main/templates/skills/cq/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dwoolworth/devteam --skill code-review-dwoolworth

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CQ's core skill focuses on reviewing code changes and producing a clear PASS or FAIL with actionable feedback, accelerating PR reviews and improving code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gather context from planning discussions, PR comments, and ticket details to understand intent.
  • Read the diff comprehensively, including added, removed, and modified lines across files.
  • Run static analysis and security checks to surface defects, vulnerabilities, and policy violations.
  • Provide structured feedback and suggested fixes to help engineers address issues quickly.

Quick Start

Provide a PR URL or number and ask CQ to review it for a PASS or FAIL with actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request to get a PASS or FAIL decision?

Automating pull request code review involves analyzing code diffs against static analysis and policy checks to return a clear PASS or FAIL decision with actionable feedback. This streamlines PR assessments by surfacing defects and vulnerabilities.

What is the best way to provide actionable review feedback on code changes?

Providing actionable review feedback on code changes requires reading added, removed, and modified lines comprehensively, then combining static analysis results with policy checks to generate structured guidance. This helps engineers address vulnerabilities and defects quickly.

How does static analysis integrate into PR assessments across multiple software branches?

Static analysis integrates into PR assessments by scanning code changes across multiple branches to detect vulnerabilities and policy violations. It outputs structured guidance that helps reviewers decide PASS or FAIL across software projects.

Can I use code review automation for security and quality checks on existing diffs?

Yes, code review automation supports security and quality checks on existing diffs. It gathers context from planning discussions and PR comments to analyze modified lines, returning structured feedback to address policy violations.

What do I need to provide to start an automated code review of my software project?

To start an automated code review, you need to provide a PR URL or number. The system gathers ticket details and PR comments to understand intent before analyzing the diff and running static analysis.

Are there limitations to using automated diff analysis for policy checks?

Automated diff analysis for policy checks is limited by the context provided in planning discussions and PR comments. It relies on available static analysis results, meaning incomplete ticket details may impact the accuracy of the PASS or FAIL decision.