code-review-evaluation

To evaluate external PR reviews against your project conventions, provide the external review comments and PR context to this skill. It compares suggestions from tools like Gemini or CodeRabbit against your internal guidelines and outputs a structured verdict with actionable recommendations.

The best way to stop convention drift from automated code review tools is to systematically compare their suggestions against documented internal guidelines. This skill flags deviations and offers alignment steps to ensure consistent decisions across your repository.

Yes, this code review evaluation works with suggestions from Gemini and CodeRabbit. It analyzes external PR review comments from these similar tools to prevent drift and ensure recommendations align with your team's documented conventions.

To decide whether to adopt, modify, or reject an external code review suggestion, run the comment through this skill with your PR context. It applies your internal guidelines to return a structured evaluation with recommended actions for each suggestion.

Yes, you need to store internal guidelines in the repository to evaluate external reviewers. The skill requires clear references to your documented conventions, style guidelines, and safety checks to accurately compare and flag deviations in external suggestions.