What problem does it solve? Code reviews often become inconsistent, overly nitpicky, or delayed, leading to missed bugs, hurt team morale, and slow merge cycles. This Skill provides a systematic review process with checklists, feedback frameworks, and language-specific patterns so reviews catch real issues while fostering knowledge sharing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Phased Review Process: A four-phase workflow covering context gathering, high-level design review, line-by-line analysis, and a summarized decision with clear verdicts. - Feedback Techniques: Question-based feedback, severity labels (blocking, nit, suggestion, praise), and collaborative phrasing to keep reviews constructive. - Language-Specific Checklists: Python and TypeScript/JavaScript anti-patterns such as mutable default arguments, broad exception handling, unhandled async errors, and prop mutation. - Use Case: When reviewing a teammate's 300-line pull request, use this Skill to run through the security, performance, and testing checklists, then deliver prioritized feedback with severity labels and a clear approve/request-changes decision. ## Quick Start Review this pull request using the code review checklist and provide prioritized feedback with severity labels.
