code-review-expert

Name: code-review-expert
Availability: InStock
Author: TinNguyen

Review git changes for SOLID, architecture, and security risks.

1|Updated Jan 26, 2026

Search Tags:#performance #security #error-handling #code-review #solids #review-workflow #boundary-conditions

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills --skill code-review-expert-asktinnguyen

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-expert
Source: https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills/tree/main/code-review-expert
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills --skill code-review-expert-asktinnguyen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Conduct structured code reviews of the current git changes with a focus on SOLID, architecture, and security risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured evaluation of changes against SOLID principles, architecture boundaries, and risk factors.
Actionable recommendations for improvements, refactoring candidates, and security hardening.
Audit and documentation of findings with a clear remediation plan.

Quick Start

Read the current diff and run the review workflow to produce a prioritized set of improvements and blockers.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-expert

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review git changes for SOLID principles and security risks?▼

A structured code review workflow evaluates current git diffs against SOLID principles, architecture boundaries, and security risk factors. It generates a prioritized output containing actionable improvements, refactoring candidates, and a clear remediation plan.

What is the best way to conduct code reviews on large diffs with mixed concerns?▼

Large diffs with mixed concerns are handled using a predefined workflow that performs preflight context analysis, SOLID and architecture smell checks, and reliability scanning. This approach identifies refactoring candidates and outputs a standardized review format for risk assessment.

Can I use an automated review workflow for both frontend and backend modules?▼

Yes, a structured review workflow can be applied to typical code changes in both frontend and backend modules. It evaluates mixed concerns requiring risk assessment, identifies refactoring candidates, and outputs actionable recommendations for security hardening.

How does a structured code review workflow handle boundary conditions and error-handling?▼

The review workflow handles boundary conditions and error-handling by executing security and reliability scanning phases. It detects potential architecture smells and risk factors, generating a prioritized remediation plan with actionable recommendations for reliability improvements.

How do I identify refactoring and removal candidates during a code review?▼

Refactoring and removal candidates are identified by executing SOLID and architecture smell checks on the current git diff. The workflow plans removal candidates and generates a standardized review output with actionable recommendations for code improvements.