skills.rest
AskTinNguyen
AskTinNguyenCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

code-review-expert

Review git changes for SOLID, architecture, and security risks.

1|Updated Jan 26, 2026
Search Tags:#performance#security#error-handling#code-review#solids#review-workflow#boundary-conditions
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills --skill code-review-expert-asktinnguyen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-expert
Source: https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills/tree/main/code-review-expert
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AskTinNguyen/vesper-team-skills --skill code-review-expert-asktinnguyen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Conduct structured code reviews of the current git changes with a focus on SOLID, architecture, and security risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured evaluation of changes against SOLID principles, architecture boundaries, and risk factors.
  • Actionable recommendations for improvements, refactoring candidates, and security hardening.
  • Audit and documentation of findings with a clear remediation plan.

Quick Start

Read the current diff and run the review workflow to produce a prioritized set of improvements and blockers.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-expert

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review git changes for SOLID principles and security risks?▼

A structured code review workflow evaluates current git diffs against SOLID principles, architecture boundaries, and security risk factors. It generates a prioritized output containing actionable improvements, refactoring candidates, and a clear remediation plan.

What is the best way to conduct code reviews on large diffs with mixed concerns?▼

Large diffs with mixed concerns are handled using a predefined workflow that performs preflight context analysis, SOLID and architecture smell checks, and reliability scanning. This approach identifies refactoring candidates and outputs a standardized review format for risk assessment.

Can I use an automated review workflow for both frontend and backend modules?▼

Yes, a structured review workflow can be applied to typical code changes in both frontend and backend modules. It evaluates mixed concerns requiring risk assessment, identifies refactoring candidates, and outputs actionable recommendations for security hardening.

How does a structured code review workflow handle boundary conditions and error-handling?▼

The review workflow handles boundary conditions and error-handling by executing security and reliability scanning phases. It detects potential architecture smells and risk factors, generating a prioritized remediation plan with actionable recommendations for reliability improvements.

How do I identify refactoring and removal candidates during a code review?▼

Refactoring and removal candidates are identified by executing SOLID and architecture smell checks on the current git diff. The workflow plans removal candidates and generates a standardized review output with actionable recommendations for code improvements.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
ducthang-hubducthang-hub

ai-code-review-ai-kit

Review added or modified PR diff lines for bugs, security, and reliability risks.

Community
Intermediate
omni-system-creatoromni-system-creator
16

review-code

Review OMS code changes for security, quality, and maintainability.

Community
Advanced
dtsoladtsola
1.0k

code-review-expert

Analyzes git changes for compliance with SOLID design and flags security risks and code-quality issues.

Community
Advanced
AidenSbVevoAidenSbVevo
1

security-audit

Orchestrate static analysis, supply-chain risk, and configuration review with Semgrep and CodeQL.

Community
Advanced