code-review-expert

Review current git changes for SOLID violations, security risks, and architectural issues.

1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill code-review-expert-linnanli
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-expert
Source: https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-review-expert
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill code-review-expert-linnanli

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides expert, structured reviews of current git changes from a senior engineer perspective, identifying SOLID violations, security risks, performance bottlenecks, and code quality issues to guide safe, maintainable improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured preflight and language-specific review passes to surface high-impact issues across architectures, security, and performance.
  • Priority-based findings with clear remediation guidance, emphasizing correctness, data integrity, and maintainability for multi-language repos.
  • Output formatting and follow-up workflow including an actionable summary, risk levels, and suggested next steps.

Quick Start

Run a structured git-change review to surface SOLID violations, security gaps, and architectural smells.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-expert

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review git changes for SOLID violations and security risks?

To review git changes for SOLID violations and security risks, analyze current diffs against language guides and safety checklists. This surfaces architectural smells and security gaps across multi-language codebases, producing structured findings with an actionable remediation plan.

What is static analysis for code quality in multi-language codebases?

Static analysis for code quality in multi-language codebases inspects frontend, backend, and script diffs to detect architectural issues and performance bottlenecks. It prioritizes runtime-critical paths to ensure correctness and maintainability across mixed-language changes.

Can I use automated code review for mixed-language diffs across frontend and backend?

Automated code review supports mixed-language diffs across frontend, backend, and scripts by applying language-specific passes and SOLID prompts. It identifies priority-based findings to ensure data integrity and maintainability for multi-language repositories.

What's the best way to find performance bottlenecks in current git changes?

Finding performance bottlenecks in current git changes requires a structured review prioritizing runtime-critical paths. Applying static analysis surfaces performance issues alongside SOLID violations and security risks, yielding clear risk-level remediation guidance.

How do I get an actionable remediation plan after identifying architectural issues?

Getting an actionable remediation plan after identifying architectural issues requires processing current git changes through structured review passes. This generates an output summary with risk levels and suggested next steps, guiding safe and maintainable improvements.