code-review-expert

Identify SOLID, security, and quality issues in current git changes.

3.8k|340|Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sanyuan0704/code-review-expert --skill code-review-expert-sanyuan0704
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-expert
Source: https://github.com/sanyuan0704/code-review-expert/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sanyuan0704/code-review-expert --skill code-review-expert-sanyuan0704

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Skill provides structured, senior-engineer level reviews of the current git changes, focusing on architecture, SOLID principles, security risks, performance, and code quality to surface actionable improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • SOLID + Architecture: Detect design smells and propose minimal, safe improvements.
  • Security & Reliability: Identify potential vulnerabilities, auth gaps, and reliability issues.
  • Code Quality & Performance: Flag error handling gaps, performance hotspots, and boundary condition risks.
  • Use Case: Integrate as a pre-merge review to produce a prioritized, actionable report ready for developer action.

Quick Start

Review the current git changes with the skill to generate a structured assessment. Example: Run the code-review-expert against your active diff.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-expert

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review git diff for SOLID principle violations before merging?

Reviewing git diff for SOLID violations is done by checking current changes against SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, and DIP rules to detect design smells and propose minimal, safe architectural improvements.

What is the best way to identify security vulnerabilities in a pull request?

Identifying security vulnerabilities in a pull request involves scanning security-sensitive modules within the git diff to detect potential risks, authentication gaps, and reliability issues for a prioritized remediation plan.

Can I use automated code review to assess error handling and performance hotspots?

Automated code review assesses error handling and performance by flagging error handling gaps, performance hotspots, and boundary condition risks directly within the current git changes.

Does this code review approach work with standard git changes and pull requests?

This code review approach works directly with standard git changes and pull requests, analyzing the active diff across architecture, security-sensitive modules, and performance-critical paths to output an actionable report.

How to generate a prioritized remediation plan from a code diff?

Generating a prioritized remediation plan from a code diff requires evaluating the changes for architecture, security, and code quality issues, then formatting the findings into a structured, actionable report ready for developer action.