code-review

Automate structured code change reviews for quality, security, performance, and maintainability.

15|1|Updated Dec 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FreePeak/ktme --skill code-review-freepeak
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/FreePeak/ktme/tree/main/.kilo/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FreePeak/ktme --skill code-review-freepeak

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review is often inconsistent and time-consuming. This Skill provides a structured, repeatable framework to assess code changes for quality, security, performance, and maintainability, ensuring thorough reviews with consistent criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-based Review Framework that guides context, diffs, and quality checks.
  • Built-in templates and checklists to standardize reviews across teams.
  • Use Cases: PR reviews, security audits, and refactoring analyses to improve code health.

Quick Start

Provide a code change and ask the skill to generate a phased review using the built-in templates.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a structured code review for a pull request?

Automate a structured code review by providing your pull request diff to generate a phased evaluation. The framework analyzes context, assesses quality, and checks security systematically before merge.

What is a phase-based review framework for code changes?

A phase-based review framework guides systematic code evaluation through context understanding, diff analysis, and comprehensive quality checks. It uses built-in templates to standardize assessments across teams.

How can I standardize security and quality checks across my team's code reviews?

Standardize security and quality checks using built-in templates and checklists that enforce consistent criteria. This repeatable framework assesses maintainability and performance systematically for every code change.

Can I use this code review framework for pre-commit checks and refactoring analysis?

You can use this framework for pre-commit checks, refactoring analysis, and security audits across software projects. It evaluates code changes systematically to improve overall code health before merging.

What's the best way to perform a diff analysis for maintainability and security?

Perform diff analysis for maintainability and security by applying a structured rubric to code changes. The framework generates actionable recommendations based on comprehensive quality checks and context understanding.

Why are my code reviews inconsistent and how do I fix it?

Code reviews become inconsistent without a structured framework. Fix this by applying repeatable templates and a phased evaluation rubric to assess quality, security, and performance systematically.