code-review

Analyze code changes for security, performance, accessibility, and quality issues.

3|Updated Mar 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gokulkrishh/skills --skill code-review-gokulkrishh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/gokulkrishh/skills/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gokulkrishh/skills --skill code-review-gokulkrishh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the tedious and error-prone process of manually reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, accessibility issues, and general code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Analysis: Checks against OWASP Top 10, performance anti-patterns, accessibility standards, and code quality best practices.
  • Severity-Based Findings: Categorizes issues into Critical, Warning, Suggestion, and Good, prioritizing fixes.
  • Structured Reporting: Provides a clear, actionable report with a final verdict.
  • Use Case: Integrate this skill into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically flag potential issues before they reach production, ensuring higher quality and more secure code.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to analyze the changes in the current pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for OWASP Top 10 security vulnerabilities?

Automated code reviews for OWASP Top 10 security vulnerabilities analyze code changes from pull requests, branches, or staged files to identify security flaws. The skill outputs structured findings categorized by severity levels with actionable remediation suggestions.

Can I check code quality and accessibility standards in a CI/CD pipeline?

Checking code quality and accessibility standards in a CI/CD pipeline flags potential issues before they reach production. The analysis evaluates code against accessibility standards and performance anti-patterns, outputting a structured report with a final verdict.

What is the best way to prioritize fixes from an automated code analysis?

Prioritizing fixes from an automated code analysis is handled by categorizing issues into Critical, Warning, Suggestion, and Good severity levels. This severity-based reporting structure clearly highlights the most urgent security and performance problems for immediate remediation.

Does automated code review work with staged files and branch changes?

Automated code review works with staged files and branch changes by analyzing code changes from various sources. It checks these changes against performance anti-patterns, accessibility standards, OWASP Top 10, and quality best practices without requiring external dependencies.

How do I get actionable suggestions for performance bottlenecks and security issues?

Getting actionable suggestions for performance bottlenecks and security issues involves running an automated analysis that outputs structured findings. The resulting report provides clear, actionable suggestions for remediation alongside a final verdict on the overall code quality.