code-review

Analyze code changes for security, reliability, and maintainability issues.

14|2|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gquthier/CLAWG --skill code-review-gquthier
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/gquthier/CLAWG/tree/main/skills/software-development/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gquthier/CLAWG --skill code-review-gquthier

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Code Review Skill helps reviewers identify security, quality, and maintainability issues during code reviews, ensuring consistent standards across projects.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security-first checks: detect hardcoded secrets, input validation gaps, and authorization flaws.
  • Quality and maintainability: enforce readability, tests, DRY principles, and clear feedback.
  • Structured reviews: produce consistent, actionable feedback aligned with a standard template.
  • Use Case: during a pull request, generate a comprehensive review summary with prioritized issues and suggested fixes.

Quick Start

Review the provided code changes for security and quality issues and output a structured feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for security vulnerabilities and maintainability in pull requests?

Automated code review analyzes pull request diffs to identify security vulnerabilities, reliability gaps, and maintainability concerns. It generates structured feedback with explicit issue identification and actionable recommendations to ensure consistent quality standards.

What is the best way to provide structured code review feedback on a pull request?

Structured code review feedback is produced by analyzing code changes against standardized review templates. This enforces readability and DRY principles while prioritizing identified issues into an actionable summary with suggested fixes.

Can I check existing code bases for hardcoded secrets and input validation gaps?

Yes, security-first checks scan existing code bases and diffs to detect hardcoded secrets, input validation gaps, and authorization flaws. This automated static analysis provides explicit issue identification across common languages.

Does code review support guardrails and standardized templates across different projects?

Code review supports guardrails and standardized review templates to maintain consistent quality and maintainability standards across projects. This ensures structured, actionable feedback aligned with your specific workflow requirements.

How do I generate a comprehensive review summary with prioritized issues and suggested fixes?

Generate a comprehensive review summary by analyzing code changes for security and quality issues. The output provides prioritized issues and actionable recommendations based on automated checks during review workflows.

When do I need static analysis for code review instead of manual checks?

Static analysis is needed for code review at scale when enforcing security, reliability, and maintainability standards consistently. It automates the detection of vulnerabilities and quality gaps across common languages during pull request workflows.