code-review

Analyze code quality and provide structured feedback across seven evaluation axes.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hico-mrmgn/Skills --skill code-review-hico-mrmgn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/hico-mrmgn/Skills/tree/main/plugins/code-review/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hico-mrmgn/Skills --skill code-review-hico-mrmgn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

コードを分析・採点し、改善点をフィードバックするスキル。「コードをレビューして」「採点して」「このコードどう思う?」「品質を評価して」「改善点を教えて」「コードを分析して」「悪いところを指摘して」など、コードの品質評価・フィードバックが絡む作業では必ずこのスキルを参照すること。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 7-axis scoring: スコープ遵守、抽象化、コメント、エラーハンドリング、セキュリティ、命名、デッドコードを総合評価。具体的な改善点を返す。
  • PR・コードレビュー支援: レビューコメント作成、修正方針の提案、品質改善のロードマップ提示。
  • 適用対象: TypeScript, Python, React などの一般的なコードベースに適用可能。

Quick Start

Review the provided code snippet and return structured feedback based on the seven-axis rubric.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get structured code review feedback for a pull request?

To get structured code review feedback for a pull request, submit your code snippet for evaluation across seven axes including scope, abstraction, and security to receive concrete improvement suggestions.

What is the best way to evaluate TypeScript code quality automatically?

Evaluating TypeScript code quality automatically involves applying a seven-axis rubric that scores scope compliance, error handling, security, and naming to return actionable improvement points.

Can I use this code review skill to analyze Python utilities and APIs?

Yes, you can use this code review skill to analyze Python utilities and APIs, as it applies to TypeScript, Python, and other common languages to evaluate components and structured feedback.

How does a 7-axis rubric work for scoring code quality?

A 7-axis rubric for scoring code quality works by evaluating scope adherence, abstraction, comments, error handling, security, naming, and dead code to deliver comprehensive improvement recommendations.

Does this code review tool check for dead code and security vulnerabilities?

Yes, this code review tool checks for dead code and security vulnerabilities, as these are specific evaluation axes within its rubric that identify concrete areas for code improvement.

What should I not expect from automated static analysis when reviewing code?

When using automated static analysis for reviewing code, you should not expect it to fix issues automatically; it evaluates quality and provides structured feedback and modification proposals for developers to implement.