code-review

Analyze GitHub pull requests and generate structured code review reports.

3|Updated Feb 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ilonatommy/copilot-skills --skill code-review-ilonatommy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/ilonatommy/copilot-skills/tree/main/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ilonatommy/copilot-skills --skill code-review-ilonatommy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of conducting thorough code reviews for GitHub pull requests, ensuring code quality, security, and alignment with project requirements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Analysis: Evaluates code against problem alignment, quality, security, and design principles.
  • Automated Reporting: Generates structured review reports detailing findings and recommendations.
  • Use Case: When a developer submits a pull request, this Skill can be invoked to provide an immediate, detailed review, highlighting potential issues and suggesting improvements before human review.

Quick Start

Review the GitHub pull request at https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for GitHub pull requests?

Automating code review for GitHub pull requests requires analyzing PR diffs, issue discussions, and repository context to evaluate problem alignment, code quality, and security threats. This generates structured review reports with findings and improvement recommendations.

What does a comprehensive code quality and security analysis evaluate?

A comprehensive code quality and security analysis evaluates problem alignment, code quality, security threats, alternative approaches, and edge cases. It also identifies duplicate or existing implementations by analyzing PR diffs and repository context to generate structured review reports.

How can I check a pull request for security threats before human review?

Checking a pull request for security threats before human review is done by analyzing PR diffs and repository context to identify security vulnerabilities and edge cases. This produces structured review reports highlighting potential issues and suggesting alternative approaches.

Can I identify duplicate or existing implementations in a GitHub PR diff?

Yes, you can identify duplicate or existing implementations in a GitHub PR diff by evaluating the code against repository context and issue discussions. This analysis detects overlapping implementations and generates structured review reports.

Does automated code review evaluate alternative approaches and edge cases?

Yes, automated code review evaluates alternative approaches and edge cases by analyzing PR diffs, issue discussions, and repository context. It assesses problem alignment and code quality to generate structured reports with actionable recommendations.

What is the best way to review code alignment with project requirements?

The best way to review code alignment with project requirements is to analyze PR diffs and issue discussions against repository context. This evaluates problem alignment, code quality, and security threats, yielding structured review reports with improvement recommendations.