code-review

Automate code reviews to enforce coding standards and identify issues.

Updated Nov 28, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ivanleal-dev/ai-driven-starter --skill code-review-ivanleal-dev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/ivanleal-dev/ai-driven-starter/tree/main/.github/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ivanleal-dev/ai-driven-starter --skill code-review-ivanleal-dev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code, ensuring adherence to project standards, identifying potential bugs, and improving overall code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Analysis: Scans code for common errors, style violations, and security vulnerabilities.
  • Best Practice Enforcement: Verifies that code follows established architectural patterns and coding conventions.
  • Use Case: Before merging a new feature branch, use this Skill to perform an automated review, flagging any deviations from the project's coding standards and suggesting improvements.

Quick Start

Initiate a code review for the latest commit in the current branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review before merging a feature branch?

Automate code review by scanning your latest commit to flag style violations, errors, and security vulnerabilities, ensuring your feature branch adheres to predefined coding standards before merging.

How do I enforce coding standards and best practices across my development workflow?

Enforce coding standards by applying automated code analysis that verifies your development workflow follows established architectural patterns, project conventions, and predefined linting rules.

What does automated code analysis check for in a software project?

Automated code analysis checks software projects for common errors, security vulnerabilities, and style violations to maintain code quality and improve overall consistency across the codebase.

Can I use predefined linting rules to maintain code quality and consistency?

Yes, you can use predefined linting rules to guide automated code reviews, verifying that your codebase adheres to specific style guides and maintaining consistency across your software project.

Does automated code review replace manual checks for architectural patterns?

Automated code review supplements manual checks by verifying adherence to established architectural patterns and coding conventions, but developers still handle complex structural design decisions.

When should I avoid relying solely on automated code review?

Avoid relying solely on automated code review when addressing complex business logic or nuanced architectural decisions, as it primarily targets predefined linting rules, style violations, and common errors.