code-review

Identify and evaluate code quality issues across multiple languages, producing structured findings and a REVIEW.md summary.

Updated Jan 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed --skill code-review-jaredlander
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed --skill code-review-jaredlander

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are often inconsistent, time-consuming, and prone to missing critical correctness, security, and architectural issues. This Skill standardizes evaluation across languages and contexts, delivering repeatable, actionable findings and a human-readable SUMMARY.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured findings: Generate precise, actionable issues for developers to fix.
  • REVIEW.md summary: Produce a comprehensive, human-friendly summary document.
  • Cross-language analysis: Review code across languages and frameworks with consistent criteria.
  • Use Case: Audit a feature for correctness, security, and maintainability and deliver remediation steps.

Quick Start

Provide the codebase to review (path or URL) and request a structured findings report plus a REVIEW.md summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for correctness, security, and performance issues?

Automate code review by applying a standardized workflow to evaluate correctness, security, performance, testing, documentation, and architecture concerns across multiple languages, producing structured findings and actionable remediation recommendations.

Can I generate a human-readable code review summary for my repository?

Yes, generate a human-readable REVIEW.md summary that organizes code quality issues, severity ratings, and remediation recommendations into a comprehensive document suitable for developer workflows.

What is the best way to standardize code quality audits across different programming languages?

Standardize cross-language code quality audits by applying consistent evaluation criteria to detect correctness, security, performance, and architectural concerns, delivering repeatable findings and a comprehensive summary document.

How do I get actionable remediation steps from a codebase audit?

Get actionable remediation steps by auditing your codebase to identify specific issues with severity ratings, then generating structured findings and an organized summary document with recommended fixes.

Does cross-language code analysis work for reviewing both correctness and architecture concerns?

Yes, cross-language analysis reviews code across languages and frameworks using consistent criteria to detect correctness, security, performance, testing, documentation, and architecture concerns simultaneously.

What do I need to provide to start a structured code review of my target repository?

Provide the codebase path or URL to review, then request a structured findings report and a REVIEW.md summary to receive actionable issues, severity ratings, and remediation recommendations.

Related Skills