code-review

Identify and evaluate code quality issues across multiple languages, producing structured findings and a REVIEW.md summary.

Updated Jan 14, 2026

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed --skill code-review-jaredlander

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jaredlander/freshbooks-speed --skill code-review-jaredlander

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are often inconsistent, time-consuming, and prone to missing critical correctness, security, and architectural issues. This Skill standardizes evaluation across languages and contexts, delivering repeatable, actionable findings and a human-readable SUMMARY.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured findings: Generate precise, actionable issues for developers to fix.
REVIEW.md summary: Produce a comprehensive, human-friendly summary document.
Cross-language analysis: Review code across languages and frameworks with consistent criteria.
Use Case: Audit a feature for correctness, security, and maintainability and deliver remediation steps.

Quick Start

Provide the codebase to review (path or URL) and request a structured findings report plus a REVIEW.md summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code review for correctness, security, and performance issues?▼

Automate code review by applying a standardized workflow to evaluate correctness, security, performance, testing, documentation, and architecture concerns across multiple languages, producing structured findings and actionable remediation recommendations.

Can I generate a human-readable code review summary for my repository?▼

Yes, generate a human-readable REVIEW.md summary that organizes code quality issues, severity ratings, and remediation recommendations into a comprehensive document suitable for developer workflows.

What is the best way to standardize code quality audits across different programming languages?▼

Standardize cross-language code quality audits by applying consistent evaluation criteria to detect correctness, security, performance, and architectural concerns, delivering repeatable findings and a comprehensive summary document.

How do I get actionable remediation steps from a codebase audit?▼

Get actionable remediation steps by auditing your codebase to identify specific issues with severity ratings, then generating structured findings and an organized summary document with recommended fixes.

Does cross-language code analysis work for reviewing both correctness and architecture concerns?▼

Yes, cross-language analysis reviews code across languages and frameworks using consistent criteria to detect correctness, security, performance, testing, documentation, and architecture concerns simultaneously.

What do I need to provide to start a structured code review of my target repository?▼

Provide the codebase path or URL to review, then request a structured findings report and a REVIEW.md summary to receive actionable issues, severity ratings, and remediation recommendations.