code-review

Automate code review for pull requests using a checklist-driven evaluation that assesses code quality, security, and performance. This deterministic workflow compares changed files against project conventions and generates structured, actionable feedback reports.

Checklist-driven code review is a structured evaluation method that systematically assesses code quality, design patterns, safety, and performance. It provides a deterministic review path by comparing code changes against project conventions to generate standardized, actionable feedback.

Yes, you can review code security and performance for refactoring changes. The independent review workflow evaluates quality, patterns, safety, and performance across software projects, making it fully applicable for refactors and new features.

Yes, the code review workflow supports security analysis by integrating with security-reviewer agents. This enables scalable security assurance across pull requests by systematically evaluating code changes for safety vulnerabilities and quality issues.

The best way to generate standardized feedback for code changes is using a deterministic review path that evaluates changed files against project conventions. This approach produces a structured, actionable feedback report for quality and security assurance.

Use an independent code review workflow when you need to systematically assess the quality, patterns, security, and performance of code changes in pull requests, refactors, or new features without subjective bias. It ensures standardized, actionable feedback output.