skills.rest
kenlck
kenlckCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review

Automate parallel code reviews across simplicity, correctness, and security.

5|Updated Mar 30, 2026
Search Tags:#security#reporting#conventions#diff#code-review#parallel-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kenlck/skills --skill code-review-kenlck
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/kenlck/skills/tree/main/ken-swe/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kenlck/skills --skill code-review-kenlck

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Teams often spend excessive time reviewing changes across multiple dimensions, risking missed issues or inconsistent standards. This Skill automates a parallel, multi-angle review workflow to surface high-confidence concerns in a consolidated report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel reviewer lenses: Simultaneously assess simplicity & elegance, bugs & correctness, and conventions & security.
  • Scoped review inputs: Analyze PR diffs, commits, or specific directories to tailor the examination to the change.
  • Structured output: Produce a grouped, severity-tagged report with actionable recommendations for developers and reviewers.

Quick Start

Review the latest changes by providing a diff or path; the system will run parallel lenses and return a consolidated report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-angle code reviews for a pull request diff?▼

Automated multi-angle code review processes PR diffs by applying parallel reviewer lenses to assess simplicity, correctness, and security, generating a consolidated severity-tagged report.

What is parallel code review and how does it surface high-confidence issues?▼

Parallel code review simultaneously evaluates diffs across multiple lenses—simplicity, bugs, and conventions—to identify edge cases and surface high-confidence issues in a structured, grouped report with severity tagging.

Can I run a code review on specific directories or commit changes instead of a full PR?▼

Yes, you can scope the code review to specific directories or commit changes. The system accepts various inputs including PR diffs, specific paths, or individual commits to tailor the examination to the change.

Does the automated code review output include severity tags for identified issues?▼

Yes, the automated code review output includes severity tags. It produces a structured, grouped report with actionable recommendations and severity tagging to help developers and reviewers prioritize issues.

What is the best way to review code changes for security and convention violations simultaneously?▼

The best way to review code changes for security and convention violations simultaneously is using a parallel multi-angle review workflow that applies dedicated lenses to your diffs, producing a single report with actionable recommendations.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
vultukvultuk
2

review-changes

Orchestrate parallel multi-agent code reviews into a single markdown report.

Community
Advanced
SChannarongSChannarong

frontend-design

Generate frontend code with accessibility, theming, and responsive behavior.

Community
Advanced
mkusakamkusaka
7

code-review-low-effort-expanded-findings-mode

Process a unified diff and return up to eight high-priority findings per hunk.

Community
Intermediate
D3HunterD3Hunter

merge-review-json-and-submit-pr-review

Merge review JSON files and submit consolidated GitHub PR reviews.

Community
Intermediate