code-review

Manage code review workflows with structured feedback and verification protocols.

Updated Mar 26, 2026

Search Tags:#code review #task management #development workflow #verification #technical evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/locdinh209/curation-skills --skill code-review-locdinh209

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/locdinh209/curation-skills/tree/main/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/locdinh209/curation-skills --skill code-review-locdinh209

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill unit addresses the common issues of unclear or technically questionable feedback during code reviews, providing a structured approach to receiving, requesting, and verifying code changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

Receiving Feedback: A structured response pattern for technical evaluation and verification before implementing feedback.
Requesting Review: Protocols for systematic code reviews during task completion and before merging to the main branch.
Verification Gates: A strict process of verification before claiming completion or success, ensuring accuracy and honesty in work claims.
Integration with Workflows: Designed to be integrated with subagent-driven development, pull requests, and general project management.

Quick Start

Request a code review for your changes using the code-review skill and follow the provided protocols for receiving and responding to feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I structure a code review process to ensure technical rigor before merging?▼

Structuring a code review process requires systematic protocols for task completion and verification gates. This skill manages code review workflows by enforcing evidence-based claims and technical evaluation before changes merge to the main branch.

What is the best way to handle technically questionable feedback during a code review?▼

Handling questionable feedback requires a structured response pattern for technical evaluation. This skill provides protocols to verify feedback before implementation, ensuring code changes align with development workflow best practices.

How do I verify code contributions and prevent inaccurate task completion claims?▼

Verifying code contributions requires strict verification gates before claiming completion. This skill enforces accuracy and honesty in work claims by requiring evidence-based verification during the development workflow.

Can I integrate code review protocols with subagent-driven development workflows?▼

You can integrate code review protocols with subagent-driven development workflows. This skill is designed to work with subagents, pull requests, and project management, providing systematic review during task completion.

When do I need a systematic code review instead of a standard pull request check?▼

A systematic code review is needed when ensuring technical rigor and evidence-based task completion. This skill moves beyond standard checks by using subagents to verify accuracy and integrity before merging code contributions.

Does this code review skill work without additional dependencies?▼

This code review skill works without additional dependencies, relying on its internal scripts and references. It manages the review process independently, integrating directly into existing development workflows.