skills.rest
MantisWare
MantisWareCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

code-review

Score branch diffs against guidelines and generate fix prompts.

Updated Apr 29, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#diff#guidelines#code-review#pull-request#score#fix-prompts
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MantisWare/BizForge --skill code-review-mantisware
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/MantisWare/BizForge/tree/main/library/skills/development/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MantisWare/BizForge --skill code-review-mantisware

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Branch code review with structured scoring against project guidelines. Produces categorized findings with severity levels and LLM-generated fix prompts. Quality gate: only posts review to PR if score meets threshold. Triggers on: "code review", "review branch", "review PR", "review changes", "score code"

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated diff-based review across changes, with severity-scored findings and prioritized fixes.
  • Auto-generated fix prompts for each finding that guide LLMS to implement fixes.
  • Quality gate: post reviews to PR only when the final score meets or exceeds the configured gate.
  • Integrates with guidelines and supports CI workflows to enforce code quality before merge.
  • Use cases include PR pre-review, CI validation, and automated code-standard enforcement.

Quick Start

Review the current branch changes, generate a structured code-review report, and provide actionable prompts for fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for pull requests?▼

Automate code reviews by analyzing branch diffs against project guidelines to produce severity-scored findings and actionable fix prompts for your pull requests. It evaluates security, performance, and maintainability issues directly from the changes.

Can I enforce a quality gate before merging a branch?▼

Yes, enforce quality gates by configuring a score threshold that must be met before review results are posted to the pull request. This ensures CI validation blocks merges when code standards are not satisfied.

What is the best way to generate fix prompts for code review findings?▼

Generate fix prompts by running an automated diff analysis that scores findings against guidelines and produces LLM-guided prompts for each issue. This provides prioritized, actionable steps to resolve security and performance problems.

Does automated code review work with CI workflows?▼

Automated code review integrates with CI workflows to validate branch diffs, score code changes, and enforce quality standards before merges. It triggers on commands like review branch or review PR to analyze changes.

How are code review findings scored and categorized?▼

Code review findings are categorized by severity levels based on security, performance, and maintainability issues identified in the branch diff. This severity scoring prioritizes fixes for the reviewer.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
vercel-labsvercel-labs
5.8k

code-review

Analyze code changes and provide actionable feedback on defects, style, and design.

Official
Intermediate
KYRIE66nbKYRIE66nb

code-review

Review code changes for security vulnerabilities, quality issues, and maintainability concerns.

Community
Advanced
magnus919magnus919
86

qa-methodology

Standardize QA strategies for unit, integration, and E2E testing.

Community
Advanced
mwathibenmwathiben

typescript-review

Review TypeScript and JavaScript diffs against Metabase coding standards.

Community
Intermediate