code-review

You can automate code review for a pull request by running static analysis on the current branch to identify security vulnerabilities, validate security controls, and output a detailed CSV findings list with severity levels.

Static analysis for secure coding automatically scans source code repositories to detect injection points, unsafe execution scenarios, and data exposure vulnerabilities without executing the program, reducing human error in security reviews.

Yes, automated code review can check authentication and authorization handling by analyzing source code to ensure secure coding practices are followed and validating that security controls against vulnerabilities are properly implemented.

Automated code review detects supply chain and build integrity risks by analyzing software dependencies and build processes to identify security issues, ensuring secure handling of cryptographic keys and secrets management.

The best way to review specific high-risk code areas for security issues is using focused area static analysis, which targets specific parts of a software repository to identify vulnerabilities and check for resilience and abuse controls.

Output code security findings with severity and impact information by running a comprehensive repository review, which generates a detailed CSV findings list summarizing detected vulnerabilities and static analysis results.