code-review

Review changed code for defects and quality gaps before merging.

2|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nholder88/ai-agent-workflows --skill code-review-nholder88
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/nholder88/ai-agent-workflows/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nholder88/ai-agent-workflows --skill code-review-nholder88

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates and standardizes the code review process to catch defects, ensure standards compliance, and provide actionable feedback before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured review across changed files addressing completeness, correctness, conciseness, and readability.
  • Guided evaluation using the four pillars and a formal Findings & Recommendations format.
  • Audit-ready outputs to feed into governance and release documentation.

Quick Start

Provide the changed files or a link to the diff and I will generate a comprehensive, ready-to-submit Code Review Report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request before merging?

Automated code review for a pull request evaluates modified files and project docs to identify defects and quality gaps, returning a structured report with prioritized findings and recommended fixes to inform your merge decision.

What does a formal code review gate check in modified files?

A formal code review gate checks modified files for completeness, correctness, conciseness, and readability, applying project coding standards to assess quality and return audit-ready findings for merge governance.

How do I generate a structured code review report from a diff?

To generate a code review report from a diff, provide the changed files or diff link to trigger a guided evaluation across the four quality pillars, producing a ready-to-submit report with prioritized recommendations.

Can I use a standardized review process for release documentation?

Yes, a standardized review process produces audit-ready outputs formatted as a formal Findings and Recommendations report, which can be directly fed into governance and release documentation for compliance tracking.

When should I use an automated code review gate instead of manual review?

Use an automated code review gate when you need to standardize quality checks across multiple pull requests, ensuring consistent application of coding standards and structured defect identification before merges.