code-review

Automate multi-perspective code reviews with structured checklists and workflow prompts.

370|33|Updated Dec 14, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit --skill code-review-nth5693
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit --skill code-review-nth5693

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams enforce consistent, high-quality code reviews by providing structured checklists and procedures that guide reviewers through multiple perspectives.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-Review: Before submitting a PR or finishing a task, run an internal quality pass to catch issues early.
  • Peer Review: When reviewing another agent's or teammate's code (e.g., /resolve_pr), apply standardized checks to ensure consistency.
  • Plan Review: Validate implementation plans and architecture decisions against project standards.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to apply predefined quality gates during reviews. Start with a self-check before PR submission, then perform a peer review with the provided workflows and checklists.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce consistent quality gates during a pull request code review?

Automated code review applies predefined quality gates and structured checklists to enforce consistent peer review, self-review, and plan validation standards across pull requests.

What is the best way to automate a self-review checklist before submitting a PR?

Automating a self-review checklist before submitting a PR involves running an internal quality pass with predefined workflows to catch issues early and validate implementation against project standards.

How do I validate implementation plans and architecture decisions against project standards?

You validate implementation plans and architecture decisions by applying a multi-perspective plan review process that checks proposed designs against standardized project quality gates and checklists.

Can I use static analysis automation for peer review without configuring dependencies?

Yes, you can apply automated static analysis procedures for peer review directly, as this approach requires no external dependencies to guide reviewers through standardized quality checks.

When should I use an automated quality checklist instead of manual code review?

You should use an automated quality checklist when you need to streamline multi-perspective code reviews and enforce consistent quality gates across multiple reviewers without relying on manual oversight.