code-review

To automate an opinionated code review for your pull request, initiate an interactive review session with your current changes. The assistant evaluates architecture, code quality, tests, and performance while prompting for decisions before applying recommendations.

A tradeoff-focused code review evaluates code changes by explicitly surfacing architectural risks and performance tradeoffs. It clarifies suggested directions and provides structured, actionable recommendations rather than just identifying syntax issues.

Yes, you can use this structured code review process on an existing codebase. It applies to projects of varying sizes and languages, evaluating architecture, code quality, tests, and performance across the entire project.

Yes, the code review workflow requires manual input before making architectural decisions. It implements an interactive, decision-driven workflow with input prompts to align stakeholders before changes are applied.

The best way to evaluate code quality and performance tradeoffs during a review is using structured review prompts. This approach clarifies risks across architecture and tests, providing explicit recommendations and actionable feedback.