code-review

Automate architectural and quality code reviews with structured reports.

Updated Apr 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/packetalien/cursor-game-studios --skill code-review-packetalien
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/packetalien/cursor-game-studios/tree/main/.cursor/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/packetalien/cursor-game-studios --skill code-review-packetalien

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill performs an automated architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files, checking for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated code and architecture reviews across a target codebase.
  • Generates structured reports with prioritized findings and remediation guidance.
  • Use Case: Integrate into CI pipelines to enforce standards before merges.

Quick Start

Provide an automated architectural and quality code review for the given file set and return a structured report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate architectural code reviews to enforce SOLID principles?

To automate architectural code reviews, you can apply this Skill to target files or directories to check for SOLID principles, coding standards, and testability. It analyzes the codebase and produces a structured report detailing findings and recommended remediations.

What is an automated code quality check and how does it identify performance concerns?

An automated code quality check scans project files to evaluate architectural pattern adherence and performance concerns. It examines the codebase against established standards to identify violations, generating a structured report with severity levels and actionable remediation guidance.

Can I integrate static analysis for code quality into my CI pipeline before merges?

Yes, you can integrate static analysis for code quality into CI pipelines to enforce standards before merges. The Skill operates on specified file sets without external dependencies, outputting a structured report of prioritized findings suitable for automated gate checks.

Does the review process support checking testability and architectural patterns across a whole directory?

Yes, the review process supports checking testability and architectural patterns across a whole directory. You apply the Skill to a set of project files, and it evaluates the entire target scope to ensure compliance with coding standards and structural design principles.

What is the best way to generate a structured report for code review findings and severities?

The best way to generate a structured report for code review findings is to run an automated architectural analysis on the target files. This process evaluates code quality and outputs a detailed report mapping specific violations to severity levels and recommended remediations.

Why do my automated code reviews fail to catch architectural pattern violations?

Automated code reviews might fail to catch architectural pattern violations if the review process lacks specific static analysis for structural adherence. Applying a Skill configured to evaluate SOLID principles and architectural patterns ensures these design-level issues are detected and reported.