code-review

Review code for correctness, security, performance, and style.

2|Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PaulKinlan/docker-agent-test --skill code-review-paulkinlan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/PaulKinlan/docker-agent-test/tree/main/config/skills/reviewer/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PaulKinlan/docker-agent-test --skill code-review-paulkinlan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style inconsistencies, ensuring higher quality and more robust software.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Code Analysis: Analyzes code across multiple dimensions including correctness, security, performance, and style.
  • Automated Reporting: Generates structured review reports detailing findings and suggestions.
  • Use Case: Integrate this skill into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically flag potential bugs, security risks, or performance bottlenecks in new code commits before they are merged.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to review the code changes in the current workspace.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for correctness, security, and performance in a CI/CD pipeline?

Automated code review in a CI/CD pipeline flags potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and performance bottlenecks in new commits before they are merged. It analyzes code changes against requirements to ensure higher software quality.

What is static analysis for code quality and how does it identify bugs and style deviations?

Static analysis for code quality examines source code without executing it to identify potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style deviations. It categorizes findings by priority and provides actionable suggestions for improvement.

How do I generate a structured report detailing security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks?

Generating a structured report for security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks involves analyzing code across multiple dimensions including correctness and style. The resulting report categorizes findings by priority to guide actionable code improvements.

Can I analyze code changes against requirements to prevent style inconsistencies before merging?

Analyzing code changes against requirements prevents style inconsistencies by reviewing code for correctness, security, performance, and style before merging. This identifies deviations and generates actionable suggestions for robust software.

Does automated code review work without external dependencies or static analysis tools?

Automated code review functions without external dependencies, performing multi-faceted reviews of code for correctness, security, performance, and style. It independently identifies potential bugs and generates structured reports.

What is the best way to review code for security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks automatically?

The best way to review code for security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks automatically is using a multi-faceted analysis skill. It evaluates correctness, security, performance, and style, generating a structured report with prioritized findings.