code-review

To automate code review, scan modified or created files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style violations. The process auto-fixes mechanical issues based on project standards while flagging architectural changes for user confirmation, ensuring code quality before human review.

You can automatically fix code quality issues by applying mechanical fixes for common problems and style violations. However, security vulnerabilities and behavioral changes are only flagged for user confirmation, requiring human judgment to resolve complex architectural issues.

Automated code review integrates with project linters and test suites to ensure code quality and stability. By leveraging existing project standards, it validates code against configured rules and verifies that modifications do not break current test coverage.

Auto-fixing applies mechanical corrections for common code quality and style issues directly, whereas suggestion generation provides clear recommendations for complex security and architectural issues that require human judgment to implement properly.

You should not rely on automated code review for complex refactoring involving architectural or behavioral changes. The tool only flags these structural modifications for user confirmation instead of auto-fixing them, because they require manual evaluation of system impact.