What problem does it solve?
A standardized, severity-driven checklist and workflow to eliminate inconsistent reviews, missed critical issues, and unclear merge decisions during pull request evaluation.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Prioritized review checklist: A ranked list of checks from runtime errors and data integrity to style and documentation to guide what to look for first.
- Structured review records: A concise record format with severity labels (FATAL/HIGH/NORMAL/LOW), impact, and concrete fix suggestions for traceability and auditing.
- Merge decision rules: Clear criteria for mergeable, conditionally mergeable, and non-mergeable PRs with templated verdict summary to speed triage.
- Log & self-review management: Templates and templates to accumulate review history, track regressions, and a pre-PR self-review checklist for authors.
- Use Case: Apply to codebase PR reviews to produce consistent findings, generate follow-up tickets for NORMAL issues, and prevent merging when HIGH or FATAL issues exist.
Quick Start
Review the changes in PR #123 according to the code-review-protocol and produce a severity-ranked issue list, a merge decision, and actionable follow-up tasks.